09/01/2018 Danial Marler   0Comment

reddit casual sex i need a woman to fuck

Achievement posts and updates are not allowed. Feel free to share these in the Sexual Achievement Sunday threads that are provided by the mods. Fap material is not allowed. This includes sexist and rape jokes.

Joking or not, asking for pictures, hitting on people, etc, are not welcome here. Additionally, posts asking for any kind of PMs will be removed. No pictures of genitals are allowed.

If you need to post a picture, you should be going to a doctor. Topics covered by the FAQ and in countless threads already will be removed, as will posts that do not follow the guidelines in the FAQ.

More details on the community rules can be found here. What is a good website for finding locals to meet up with for some casual sex? I'm 19 and just horny all the time and have no problems meeting up with people for casual sex and what not seeing as how I am currently single.

I see plenty of advertisements for sites that find hookups and stuff but I wanted to here sexxits opinion on which are the best. As a normal woman who occasionally uses Craigslist casual encounters for just sex, that is truly the BEST answer to this question. Holy crap that was good advice! I don't personally look for hookups online, but I'm absolutely convinced that I know how to now, lol. Reading this, I am so ridiculously happy that I am a kinky bastard who operates outside of all this heteronormative bullshit.

The post you linked was a very good response, but you wouldn't believe how happy I am that I don't anymore have to put up with the incredible amount of games and unwritten rules that especially male vanilla people have to navigate.

In my world it has until now been sufficient to start a friendly conversation that includes my inclination to tie girls down and do various bad things to them, and a more or less casual relationship has developed very naturally. Can't believe that it's easier getting laid as a certified pervert, but I swear it's true.

What I mean is the ability to stay honest and not play silly games in order to get laid. This is something I see all the time in the kinky world but has never experienced in the "normal" dating scene.

The level of honest communication is just so much higher. I would say yes, but that is as a married guy in an open-relationship. Even then, it can be tough slogging in that for girls who know I am non-monogomous and are ok with that, everything is cool and easy; other girls, it's a total dealbreaker. I've never tried it, but I have a friend who did it for a while and supposedly had some success.

I'm guessing the problem is probably like every other online service for dating and getting people to meet: You can find what you are looking for one way or the other there. I have a profile up for casual sex, but plenty of others seem more serious. You can try Craigslist or OKCupid but the former will get you a lot of spam, and the latter will be mostly people looking to date. Yeah Craig's is annoying because there aren't a ton of younger people I look for the tops range.

If you are honest and upfront about what you want on OKC, it will try to match you with girls looking for something similar. When you set up your account, you can list specifics I.

My tip to you is set it that you are looking for short term dating AND casual sex. Short term dating means nearly the same thing IMO. Plus most girls won't say that they are looking for casual sex right on their profile because that invites a torrent of creepy messages.

Activity partners isn't a bad one to have up either. It reinforces to me, at least that you aren't looking for a long term relationship. Most there are looking for relationships but are very very helpful, they'll answer any questions you might have. Also it's just a damn funny community. Random casual hookups aren't my thing because the sex usually isn't great, but I also had an itch that needed to be scratched. But we are friends on top of it all.

Yesterday we went from discussing the Elder Scrolls MMO to rolling around on my bed in less than 5 seconds. Is this a new thing? I was on there a while ago and didn't pay for it. And had quite a bit of luck as well. Reddit has worked for me. Abusers will be banned from removing. But does it only connect with people on your FB who have the app?

Or does it connect to other people using it? I'm kinda confused how it works. Tindr is cool, and I've gotten a couple booty call situations from it since I started using it. It's got a lot of steam and will be a great resource! WE use Fab swingers in the UK plenty of time wasters and guys pretending to be all sorts of things on there, but found a few fun sexy people there too. Not trying to be a dick but it's probably because you're not very attractive.

That is probably the number one factor for dating site success. A lot of people post their profiles to get critiqued. I'm sure it does, this is reddit.. And you probably gave your ex a lady boner at one point and time, but she got over that it seems If you have an ex wife you can't be all that bad to begin with.

There are lot of do's and don'ts for a 'good' profile on random dating site. Just as for meeting with people in real life and the extreme variation on both; speed dating. But it's all moot and depending on the person receiving it, for example casually dropping you have an ex wife means to one that you're a guy that won't bail before or because it gets to a solid relationship but for another it may immediately wave flags of 'oh no he has baggage and I don't want to hear it'.

Also it depends a lot on the place, okcupid and Craigslist might reasonably work in the states, over here both of those are a digital wasteland.

I thought for years the online dating in my country was either non existing or just filled with fakes and 'desperates'. And then I found one obscure site with hundreds of people in the webcam chat and only explicit casual encounter profiles on the dating section.. Turns out they don't advertise and because it's so explicit no members casually spread the advertising either. It only spread a bit through people visiting swingers clubs etc.

Long story short, dating is possible, casual dating is possible, but it's a lot of luck involved not just how well your profile is build or you having the perfect pictures.. It's also a matter of being on the right site.. And the best ones won't be advertised. My buddy said he has tried eHarmony trying to find a relationship but turns out it is just all chicks that want to bang. A guy saying "All I wanna do is settle with a good woman" will translate into a lot of sex for a guy.

I would just give okcupid a try, and specifically indicate that you're interested in casual sex. If you indicate you're looking for casual sex on there, you will be avoided like the plague. I know from experience. The only sure way to get casual sex is to go to a bar or nightclub and pay for every woman to get really drunk and pray one of them wants to screw.

Don't worry about being 19, most of the girls in there are younger anyway and got in with a fake ID or flirting with a bouncer. Oh, and don't forget to be an asshole to them; they love that. And I guess I am wired to chase, not to stand on the spot and have the fruit fall right into my mouth!

I have tried to have casual sex but my partners always end up tracking me down the next day to start a relationship. I personally don't care if you've slept around but it's not my cup of tea. I've had 5 partners at 35 so I'm pretty much average by partner count definitions.

I don't get why a promiscuous person would want to be with a boring old fuddy duddy like me anyway. I feel like promiscuous people would be happier with someone that they can relate too. It's amazing to me how many people are against casual sex. I think it can be a great thing. Sexual chemistry is really important in a relationship IMO, and if you establish that then who knows?

Maybe it can become something serious? I'm now married to a person who I started out as a casual sexual relationship. And while this is the exception, just have a fling with something that leaves both people satisfied is a beautiful thing. Plus, let us remember that practice makes perfect. I'm of the belief that the more partners you have, chances are the better lover you will be.

I see casual sex like a roller-coaster. Fun while I do it, but I don't get much out of it. As soon as I' cum I'm over it. It's fun, but I wouldn't want to live at an amusement park. I am glad someone else noticed that majority of these comments as well as other AskMen topics tend to boil down to insecurities.

It has started to turn me from a big AskMen fan into someone who doesn't read much anymore. It may be because I am 23, doing well at a very well known university, and have been told by many people, both male and female, that I am fairly attractive.

I workout times a week and make sure I am always presentable. I don't know about Reddit's user stats, but I am thinking that I am an outlier where my opinions will not be respected in this community.

I wish they were, but just because its not a part of the AskMen hivemind, I don't post. I am by no means a frat boy, or a crazy partier that I may be coming off as, but I am just a regular Joe who plays guitar, lifts, and plays basketball in his spare time. I have a lot of confidence in myself, but thats not to say that I don't have insecurities because I definitely do. I LOVE casual hookups for a lot of different reasons.

It ALWAYS starts off with some harmless flirting where both parties tend to feel each other's "vibe" after the judgement of physical appearance. This in itself is a reason I think its great. Its awesome putting yourself out there with another person who is taking the same risks you are. I just find it very fun when two people slowly get to know each other and very slowly start to get intimate.

A lot of men here are saying that "its a hard thing to do it definitely is sometimes with little payoff". I have found that it is what you make it like most sex. I've had my fair share of mediocre sex, but that is whats great about the whole thing. Its two people, who have ZERO experience with each other, getting the opportunity to explore someone completely new.

Which is by far my favorite thing about it. If one person is insecure and doesn't feel like they can open up to the other, then you are going to have bad sex. This is something I've learned over time and thats why I mentioned "feeling each other's vibe". For me casual sex isn't about fucking anyone who wants to fuck. I think that is what gives people a bad reputation. Finding the right person for one intimate night is almost always fun. Thats why I enjoy it so much.

Please don't downvote, I really respect you guys and want your honest opinion. A guy that is willing to leave you because you had a lot of partners Is a good thing. Because he's an idiot.

Sex is a good thing. Protect yourself against undesired pregancy and STDs and fuck as much as you can. I personally think that it's a good thing that you know a lot about sex.

You're probably good at it. This turns me on. There are a lot of other guys like me. Personally, I don't really like it. I'm more monogamist; at least in the beginning of the relationship. If I met a girl that engaged in casual sex, it would be a pretty big turn off. I guess the idea of her getting fucked by other guys isn't something I like to think about or even know about.

In terms of casual sex as a concept, I don't really care what other people do unless it effects me. A lot of people here are claiming that they don't want to take the girl who sleeps around home to their mother.

Which is fine I guess, but I can't see how you'd know that without prying the girl or if she's slept around within your social circles. I'm all about casual sex, people should have more of it. People should fuck more. Yep, I don't hold double standards, I think it's hyprocritical and shitty if you do. Especially the most common: Having more sex makes you better at sex, the more partners you get exposed to, the more buttons, spots, positions, tricks, nooks, crannies, etc.

I knew one girl who tried to sell herself off as a "Quality, not quantity" kind of person. Well I'll tell you what, the quality was not there because eating 4 different burritos does not make you a connoisseur of Mexican cuisine.

If I can get a woman into bed on the first date, she is automatically disqualified from the relationships-category, and most likely eliminated from FWB as well.

I'm kind of the other way. I think if a girl slept with me on the first date it would show she's really into me and and it would be a good sign. It's more like "I wanna be in this club once in a while, but not as a lifetime member". It's more like "I don't want to be in any club that would have me as a member without bothering to ask for my credentials".

If I am man number , chances are very high that there will be a man number , , and so go. Unless you stay together for the rest of her life, the chances are that there will be a man after you, whether he's number or number 8. And if you do stay together until you both die of old age, then does it really matter which number you are? Numbers don't make it more or less likely that your relationship will work, either.

The thing that matters there is you and her and how well you work as a couple. Surely a woman who had had less sexual partners would be more likely to want to see what's out there than somebody who had already found out? Is it a guarantee? No, of course not. But again, past behavior tends to indicate future behavior. Why would past behavior that isn't infidelity to someone with whom exclusivity was promised indicate that a woman would cheat on you?

I think a person who has reached triple digits of sexual partners while in their 20s probably has some commitment issues, and it seems unlikely to me that they just magically disappeared. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. If they've never actually promised a faithful commitment that they betrayed, it's really not possible to use 'past behavior' as an indicator of how likely they are to keep promises they make to you.

People end up cheating on their spouse after 50 years of happy marriage, our psychology and sex drives are a bit more complex than that. Actually , they kinda do. But here's the kicker: Link 2 comes from the conservative think tank 'The Heritage Foundation' which states as its mission promoting "formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense".

They are not a bastion of unbiased scientific research, and are very tightly tied to a mission pushing abstinence only education. And the author of the study in your third link draws no distinction between two partners and two hundred partners. His conclusions are also based on marriages that were as short as five years at the time of his study - and eliminating all women over the age of If you pick younger people who haven't been married long you're more likely to find both limited sexual experience and people who haven't been divorced.

That's what I thought at the beginning of our awesome 4 year relationship, so I no longer hold that opinion. I may have just got lucky though. My longest relationship 5 years , I waited six months I had to wait six months. That's good for you, I simply apply the rules that work for me, I have no ambitions of establishing universal rules: She was afraid of the consequences, and fortunately, it appears most of them can admit those consequences do exist, whether Reddit wants to acknowledge it or not.

She is entitled to do as she pleases because it is her life, but it doesn't appear she strictly wants to live her life as the town bicycle that everyone gets a ride on.

If that's not what you want in life, doing the opposite is not going to help you get there. In an instance like this, it can severely narrow your chances, and will limit the selection of partners to choose from.

This terrible "promiscuous positive" movement doesn't deal in reality, because there are consequences to your promiscuity, especially when it comes to relationships. If you want to spend your time having casual sex, that's your choice, but trying to pretend there are no consequences and that everyone should "just accept" it is unrealistic and foolish at best.

I personally don't care if you want to have casual sex. I also made it clear when I was dating that if you had a promiscuous past, there would be no relationship. Promiscuity is the opposite of a relationship, and I was committed to having a relationship , not just being one of the many penises entering that vagina. I never cared what men did in terms of their sex life. I wasn't looking to get into a relationship with them. Women can go have casual sex all they want, it's their life.

That said, if she planned on trying to be in a relationship with me, there would be no promiscuity or casual sex. Simple and clear cut. Besides STDs and pregnancy, there really aren't any consequences.

All the so-called "consequences" you guys are mentioning in this thread are issues of jealousy and insecurity in behalf of the less promiscuous partner. All these consequences are just constructs in your head, your own issues of inadequacy.

Which is fine, you are entitled to your preferences, but don't put the blame on the other person. Just admit that these are your own issues. Come on, that's always the weak argument brought up by those who want to have casual sex. It's a huge turnoff to realize that having sex with a promiscuous woman isn't all that special because pretty much everybody has done it.

A partner is supposed to be a special person, not just someone who you're banging right now after everyone else has had a turn. It has nothing to do with jealousy or insecurity, and everything to do with respecting yourself as more than just a fuckhole. You also aren't accounting for the fact that a promiscuous woman has no issue simply sleeping around, and that never works well with a relationship.

It's the opposite of a relationship, really. Do what you want, but don't complain about the consequences your choices bring up. Live your life and take responsibility for your own actions.

In the past I would have thought the guys doing it were dicks and I was morally much better than them for wanting to be in a relationship. With time, I realised that was mainly jealously. The odd bit is ok. As I said in yesterday's thread, the women I've met who've had a lot of casual sex in their past have come with a whole load of issues. No, I'm in the camp that it takes more skill for a man to have a lot of casual sex than it does a woman.

First of all it's much more difficult for a man to have frequent casual sex with a lot of women than for a woman. I don't really judge men or women for having lots of casual sex however. As I already said, if that's what makes them happy, more power to them. The kind of reaction you mention go ahead, fuck 3 different people everyday come from 2 kinds of people:. But if you lead a normal life, it's more complex. I was surprised as well, at the amount of people who discouraged her in that thread.

I thought reddit was more progressive in this matter. Personally, I believe that if you think sex is fun, which we damned well know it is, then just have as much of it as you can while you're single. If anything, it's just good to have a lot of practice: I understood this after many replies on my comments over on that thread. That doesn't change my opinion on casual sex in general, though.

Maybe I won't encourage the next girl who asks this question, but in this thread we're looking for opinions on casual sex in general. Also, we would all do well in remembering that reddit and by extension this sub mostly contains posts by American men. I wouldn't be able to tell you exactly how American culture differs in this matter, because I'm no expert, but there is definitely a difference. In my country, for instance, promiscuity isn't as big of a dealbreaker for guys as I've understood it is in the U.

Let's get a little more hypothetical here. Do you think maybe it's subtly tied to mindset? This example might appear unrelated but bear with me;. After my first year of college, I spent a summer working a desk job. It was boring work but I really wanted the money. I was paid per hour and I had nothing better to that summer so I really went for it.

I got up every morning and was like "let's really work today! I was killing it every day for 3 months. When school started back up, I kept working evenings because that was the original format of the job even before that summer.

However, I completely lost any drive to work any more than the agreed minimum 8 hours per week and my productivity plummeted. I could still use every extra thousand as a student but I was just so sick of that office and those tasks.

I thought I got tired because I had worked many hours but that didn't make any sense. I wasn't physically tired, and I wasn't even sick of the intrinsic properties of those tasks because it was IT and that's still very much my forte. So I came to the conclusion that I was sick of the job because of my attitude.

I got tired from pushing myself to earn money. I didn't hit any goal, I just wanted as much as possible. Apologies for the long example but do you think I'm on to something here?

What if you go into casual sex with a different mindset? Could you possibly prevent bad habits or negatively affected opinions if you focus on finding a healthy "why" of casual sex, just as I could probably have prevented my work problem if I had worked hard for a different reason?

Also, I have dated girls with numerous partners, and a girl who were a virgin. I can attest that practice doesn't always make you a good lay and that some people are very quick learners.

That "progressive" argument is what's used when they want to do something that isn't commonly desirable and trying to make it so. Usually when it pertains to sex. How is that bullshit though?

What actual difference does it make whether she's fucked 10 guys or guys? If you never know her number it won't make a difference. It only makes a difference once you find out, because you start to feel inadequate and compare yourself to her previous partners. Because it's not an actual argument, it's an attempt at justification to defend it, even when it's simply as accurate label. Well, both numbers are too high, but one is obviously significantly worse.

If she's promiscuous, she's not relationship material. This is a terrible attempt at trying to make there be insecurity where there isn't any. Is it that way for some? I simply didn't want someone promiscuous. It's the opposite of a relationship, and shows she's not a "commitment" type person. My relationships were intended as a trial for marriage, not to be one of the many penises in a certain vagina. I never once "compared" myself or felt "inadequate". It was just more of a judgment that she obviously wasn't serious about a relationship, and preferred casual sex.

You can do that if you want, you just can't do that and expect to be with me in a relationship. That's the standard whether it's liked or not. My wife was never promiscuous, and yet is one of the most sexual people I ever met. She didn't feel the need to get slammed by half the city, because she views her connection to someone like that with more value than just another lay.

Having sex isn't progressive but having casual sex and liking it can be regarded as such. However, I'm not going to argue deeper about these definitions because it's not so interesting for the discussion. Let's just agree that casual sex is in this forum still regarded as somewhat controversial. You're completely right, by the way.

Experience is not a reliable indicator of sexual skill. While I've never taken a girl's virginity, I can attest to experiences which are similar to yours. Practicing to become better at sex isn't a given for everyone. It is for me though because I actively seek to learn new things. I like it, although it gets boring after a while. I have nothing against people that have casual sex obviously , as long as they don't cheat or try to steal someone's partner.

Don't care if a woman has a lot of casual sex either. Note though that I have a higher standard in attractiveness and an existent one in personality for a relationship and that a woman I'd have casual sex with is very often one I wouldn't think of having a relationship with. Not for the casual sex thing, she just doesn't reach relationship standards. Sorry but it indicates how you value things. Yourself, your fertility, your sexuality, and maybe a few other things. I'm just one guy though and if you like it, go ahead but I probably won't be the one for you.

I have nothing against it or anything for it. I do think it's an impulsive, instant pleasure that doesn't offer any long-term benefits; a cheap thrill. I have no problem with people who do it in moderation. What I think is moderation is different than somewhat else idea of moderation.

People who have a lot of it, I can't help but think they have qualities that aren't desirable for a relationship sexually impulsive, short-sighted.. It doesn't make them bad people, but it could make them a bad choice for a relationship.

Someone who orders fast-food for almost every meal could be a good cook, but anyone should see why most people wouldn't think so. Keep in mind that some people don't want a relationship. Either not at the time, or more rarely, ever. If they don't want a relationship, then they would still be a bad choice for someone looking for a relationship. If they change their minds later and decide that they want a relationship that's fine, everyone has a right to change their minds.

It doesn't magically make them a good candidate for one though at least for me. Casual sex done responsibly is perfectly fine. Sex is fun, it helps you relax, it can make you understand someone a lot better than their words or actions ever truly can. Wanna know what a person is truly like? Get in bed with them. I've had two one-night stands and they were both interesting and appealing experiences.

But I've been luckier than most, I think. It honestly doesn't bother me if my partner has had more sex or much more casual sex than me. Starting a relationship with someone means that you want to start another section of your life with that person. I've never looked at my partner and thought about anonymous penises.

I'm too busy basking in how awesome and beautiful she is as a full human being , not just the number of dicks she's ridden. Anyone too concerned about the number of sex partners, says a lot more about them, than the promiscuous partner. Anyone too busy thinking about anonymous, past, sex partners is too stuck in their own insecurities to believe someone would want to date them or be with them for the long run. Believe it or not, people CAN settle down.

People can find someone that makes them want to be loyal and monogamous. If you find yourself with a partner that feels that way about you, and instead you are looking at a number, like it's some huge deal then you are a fool. Casual sex is cool, I guess. I'm not really one for that kind of thing. If it works for other people, great! They have different interests than me. My only experience with casual sex comes from a few FWB relationships that have actually worked out.

Personally have no problem with it in other people - don't be destructive to your self or others and that should be fine. For myself, i only like casual sex with people i know.

Granted I've never picked a girl up from a bar for a one night stand so i don't actually know from experience, but to me that's like vaginally assisted masturbation. I like knowing the person im sleeping with and having a connection, so it'll either be my partner or one of my friends, in the same way i would only go on a road trip with my partner or friend - why would i wanna do thar with a total stranger?

Again, I've never done it though, it just doesn't appeal to me. If you feel bad after casual sex, perhaps you should examine how you recieve personal validation. Look to freinds, family and professional accomplishment for this. Casual sex should be about adventure not validation. I don't think it matters at all, as long as you don't end up disease ridden with 8 kids each from a different guy, by all means, have sex with a bunch of different men, I'll reap the benefits when we get together, even if it's also only for casual sex.

It seems like a good idea in theory, but I personally couldn't manage it in practice. I'm not an extremely sociable guy, and the idea of approaching random women is not feasible for me. In regards to my opinion being the same for both men and women, I would say no for two reasons. One reason is that it is harder for men to achieve casual sex than women. In that regards, I do get a bit of respect for a man who can achieve large amounts of casual sex, while I am mostly apathetic to women who can achieve casual sex.

Secondly, I'm attracted to women but not men, so obviously I would not be looking at men as potential partners. In that regards, I would not date a woman who had a lot of casual sex under her belt. That's just my preference, not saying they are immoral or anything, just a personal dating preference I have.

It isn't for me but I don't look down on those that it works for, men or women. Sex for me is a no go area unless I have strong feelings for a woman. My opinion of casual sex?

It's not very fulfilling. It's awkward, and unconnected, generally a basic physical release, and usually not even that because I have a hard time getting off without being strongly connected with a person first. I don't really care if someone has casual sex, regardless of the number of partners. I'll only ever bring it up if they're casually involved with somebody who I think is an incredibly bad influence or potential danger to their well being.

My opinion is the same regarding men and women. Generally I've found most of the women I know who are up for casual sex without commitment, know what's up and how to look out for potentially risky behaviors, so I don't even feel the need to admonish them on being careful or whatever; I have known one or two who were somewhat naive in that regard, and did ask them to be careful about who they chose to spend time with.

But, I've done the same with guys, more frequently actually, because the guys I know often seem to ignore how they feel about things, and just try to pursue casual sex because its a thing they should do. They end up in bad tangles because they fail to watch for flags, and get a lot of trouble in their lives for it with troublesome hookups. As long as it's consensual and approached smartly and honestly health issues, condoms, etc. I personally prefer a lover who knows what they like, yet open to new things.

That usually translates to someone who has had variety in their sex life. Can be hot in the right circumstances, but the intimacy and experience of a SO usually wins out. That being said, dabbled in swinging with an ex, and that was pretty fun because you get a mixture of the intimacy you share with your SO and the excitement of adding new people to the mix. Whatever floats your boat. Agree with others that from a male perspective, casual sex is a lot of work, and sometimes you just get tired of the chase as fun as it can be.

Again, whatever makes you happy. I don't judge differently by way of gender or orientation or anything like that. I pretty much just don't judge, because it's not my place. I wouldn't mind it if it didn't involve so much work and time in places I don't really want to be.

I actually judge men more for having a lot of casual sex. While I understand the drive behind it, the willingness to blow all that time and money for a relatively small percentage change of having sex seems like they wouldn't have much time to do anything interesting.

For a woman assuming a base line of attractiveness , there is much less work and dedication required to do it, so there's less of an impression that that's what they do for fun.

Still, someone who spent night after night in a bar would probably be unappealing. Neither of these related to college hook up culture, since my college experience was all men at a commuter school and I have no idea what that culture is like. Its fun and I enjoy it. Its not better than sex with someone you feel very strongly about, but if its something you are into, it can be lots of fun.

Sex with people you have feelings for is always better than people you care nothing about. I responded to her thread, stating that what matters is how she feels about her sexual past and the people she chooses to have sex with.

I'm not interested in casual sex, and I'm not interested in anyone who has casual sex while single. I personally disapprove of one-night stands, but I also disapprove of shaming people who have casual sex. My opinion doesn't change between genders when it comes to how many people they've had sex with. Whatever rocks their boat.

I know I enjoy it and I don't feel any lesser for it. I don't understand why so many men seem to want it. Are you really going to get a woman's best performance that one night you sleep with her?

You might, there is definitely the possibility, but probably not. It works if you find someone who you don't like personality wise but are just attracted to them. Me and this girls were friends with benefits for quite some time but neither of us ever got attached and we just hitting the other one up and it was deaded without any problems.

I'm 20 years old. They have casual sex. I'm jealous of the guys who manage to have lots of casual sex. Not because I want to do that too but because they're obviously really good at attracting women. So they have a bigger pool of women to choose as partners and probably won't have many problems finding love and a relationship.

They're obviously good at something most guys struggle with. Women don't get the same respect because, well, they don't have to put in work to get laid. So there's no skill to admire. And to me, the higher the number of her past sexual partner, the less atrtactive she'd be to me. You realize that women like sex too, right?

Some guys are so attractive that they don't need to put in effort either, women just want to fuck them. It doesn't necessarily boil down to skill. Well, I've never seen a guy who was so attractive that women were throwing themselves at him, honestly. But yeah, ok, those guys exist. But they are incredibly rare. Most guys who sleep around a lot aren't stunners, they just have good confidence, charisma, game, whatever you want to call it.

Is it better with someone you care about? But that doesn't mean you cant have fun with a hot stranger. I say have at it. But it has no appeal to me and I have no interest in women who sleep around. I have no issue with them on moral grounds. It just makes me feel like we're incompatible.

It limits a woman's options for a serious relationship. Personally, I think emotionless sex tends to drain some people. Our sex organs are not autonomous, they're linked to a brain with complex emotional expectations. Take remarks about casual sex being as simple as walking your dog with a grain of salt.

My advice is to look for a complete, fulfilling relationship. I actually appreciate a girl that is open sexually because I enjoy non vanilla sex. What angers me is when women sleep around and then decide to tone down there sexuality when they settle down. They can do whatever they want. But I wouldn't want to be in a relationship with someone who has casual sex.

But since I'm straight I don't care at all how many women my friends have slept with. I do however care how many a future partner has slept with. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Log in or sign up in seconds.

AskMen subscribe unsubscribe , readers 4, users here now Community Rules: Read the Frequently Asked Questions and do a search before asking a question. Anyone is allowed to ask and answer questions. Do not insult or troll people, including in PMs.

The title of your post must contain your actual, concise question. Do not make posts asking about a specific person's or group of people's actions, behavior, or thinking. Do not post pictures looking for affirmation of your appearance.

Do not complain about other subs here or post to push an agenda. Do not directly link to comments in other subs. Frequently asked questions will be removed. Medical advice is not allowed on reddit.

. Just as for meeting with people in real life and the extreme variation on both; speed dating. I would just give okcupid a try, and specifically indicate that you're interested in casual sex. All kinds of people there who just want a sugardaddy. For every or so profiles I swipe right, I get about one match. I got frustrated and we kept fighting. Reddit casual sex i need a woman to fuck 14 Jan I'd love to have sex with as many women as I can. .. I'd prefer a serious relationship to casual sex, but I've got no problem with people having. 15 Jan These females prefers one night stands and casual sex affair, because they don't want Looking for a girl to have sex with (aglobalthreat.netrlsforsex). In the past, before I was married, I would usually just find casual sex . and fucking girls and some of my fondest sexual experiences have.

TIMES ADULT PERSONELS

Reddit casual sex i need a woman to fuck